Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Gender
Gender | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Female | 760 | -0.23 | 0.97 |
Male | 740 | 0.24 | 0.97 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Age
Age | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
25-34 years | 264 | -0.36 | 1.00 |
18-24 years | 193 | -0.10 | 0.98 |
35-44 years | 263 | -0.06 | 1.02 |
45-54 years | 292 | -0.05 | 0.95 |
55-64 years | 234 | 0.04 | 0.95 |
65+ | 254 | 0.53 | 0.90 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Education
Education | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Some college | 471 | -0.10 | 1.03 |
High-school | 475 | -0.07 | 0.89 |
Less than High-school | 51 | -0.05 | 1.05 |
Bachelor | 310 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
Graduate | 193 | 0.20 | 1.08 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Income Levels
Income Levels | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Less than $15,000 | 178 | -0.25 | 1.03 |
$15,000-$24,999 | 180 | -0.17 | 0.91 |
$35,000-$49,999 | 227 | -0.12 | 0.91 |
$25,000-$34,999 | 176 | -0.09 | 0.98 |
$50,000-$74,999 | 292 | 0.02 | 1.02 |
$75,000-$99,999 | 192 | 0.10 | 0.99 |
$100,000-$149,999 | 160 | 0.33 | 0.94 |
$150,000 + | 95 | 0.41 | 1.10 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Ethnicity
Ethnicity | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Black/African America | 115 | -0.49 | 0.84 |
Other | 18 | -0.27 | 0.86 |
Native American | 13 | -0.26 | 0.97 |
Latino | 88 | -0.22 | 0.94 |
Caucasian/European origin | 1237 | 0.06 | 1.01 |
Asian/Pacific Islander | 29 | 0.24 | 0.79 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Occupation
Occupation | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Unemployed | 146 | -0.41 | 1.09 |
Student | 85 | -0.23 | 1.11 |
Disabled | 98 | -0.12 | 0.96 |
Parent | 104 | -0.08 | 1.07 |
Full-time caregiver | 31 | -0.05 | 0.59 |
Employed | 768 | 0.01 | 0.98 |
Retired | 268 | 0.36 | 0.87 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Area
Area | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Urban | 955 | -0.09 | 1.01 |
Rural | 545 | 0.16 | 0.96 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Political Orientation
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Political Orientation
Political Orientation | Social Political Orientation | Economic Political Orientation | Composite Political Orientation | |||||||||
B | CI | B | CI | B | CI | B | CI | |||||
(Intercept) | -0.69 ** | -1.17 – -0.20 | -1.03 *** | -1.60 – -0.47 | -1.37 *** | -1.87 – -0.86 | -1.03 *** | -1.49 – -0.56 | ||||
Economic System Justification | 1.21 *** | 1.12 – 1.31 | 1.21 *** | 1.10 – 1.32 | 1.39 *** | 1.29 – 1.49 | 1.27 *** | 1.18 – 1.36 | ||||
Observations | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | ||||||||
R2 / adj. R2 | .294 / .293 | .230 / .229 | .334 / .333 | .330 / .329 | ||||||||
Notes | * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 |
Political Orientation | Social Political Orientation | Economic Political Orientation | Composite Political Orientation | |||||||||
B | CI | B | CI | B | CI | B | CI | |||||
(Intercept) | -1.32 *** | -1.83 – -0.82 | -1.64 *** | -2.20 – -1.08 | -2.27 *** | -2.83 – -1.72 | -1.75 *** | -2.22 – -1.27 | ||||
Economic System Justification | 1.01 *** | 0.91 – 1.10 | 0.96 *** | 0.86 – 1.06 | 1.21 *** | 1.11 – 1.31 | 1.06 *** | 0.97 – 1.14 | ||||
Age | 0.13 *** | 0.07 – 0.20 | 0.14 *** | 0.07 – 0.21 | 0.13 *** | 0.06 – 0.19 | 0.13 *** | 0.08 – 0.19 | ||||
Income | 0.01 | -0.04 – 0.07 | -0.07 * | -0.13 – -0.01 | 0.04 | -0.01 – 0.10 | -0.00 | -0.06 – 0.05 | ||||
Religiosity | 0.30 *** | 0.27 – 0.34 | 0.42 *** | 0.38 – 0.46 | 0.21 *** | 0.17 – 0.25 | 0.31 *** | 0.28 – 0.35 | ||||
Education | -0.14 ** | -0.24 – -0.04 | -0.18 ** | -0.29 – -0.07 | 0.02 | -0.09 – 0.13 | -0.10 * | -0.19 – -0.00 | ||||
Observations | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | 1500 | ||||||||
R2 / adj. R2 | .423 / .421 | .431 / .429 | .393 / .391 | .469 / .467 | ||||||||
Notes | * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Religiosity
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Religious Affiliation
Religious Affiliation | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Atheist/Agnostic | 230 | -0.51 | 1.22 |
No religion | 195 | -0.19 | 0.89 |
Muslim | 9 | -0.06 | 0.99 |
Jewish | 52 | 0.08 | 1.05 |
Christian | 1014 | 0.15 | 0.92 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by Religious Affiliation
Religious Affiliation | ρSpearman |
---|---|
Jewish | 0.01 |
No religion | 0.05 |
Atheist/Agnostic | 0.09 |
Christian | 0.11 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Religiosity & Political Orientation
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Candidate Preferences
Candidate Preference | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Bernie Sanders | 362 | -0.68 | 0.97 |
Hillary Clinton | 371 | -0.31 | 0.79 |
Gary Johnson | 68 | 0.25 | 0.96 |
Rand Paul | 44 | 0.44 | 1.07 |
Donald Trump | 444 | 0.45 | 0.84 |
Jeb Bush | 83 | 0.60 | 0.68 |
Ted Cruz | 122 | 0.60 | 0.82 |
Candidate Preferences | N | Mean | SD | Range |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bernie Sanders | 362 | 4.18 | 1.07 | 1-9 |
Hillary Clinton | 371 | 4.60 | 0.87 | 1-9 |
Gary Johnson | 68 | 5.21 | 1.05 | 1-9 |
Rand Paul | 44 | 5.42 | 1.17 | 1-9 |
Donald Trump | 444 | 5.43 | 0.92 | 1-9 |
Jeb Bush | 83 | 5.59 | 0.75 | 1-9 |
Ted Cruz | 122 | 5.59 | 0.90 | 1-9 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Candidate Preferences
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Party Preferences
Party Preference | N | Mean | SD |
---|---|---|---|
Green Party | 40 | -1.34 | 1.19 |
Democratic Party | 560 | -0.47 | 0.87 |
Don’t know | 90 | -0.13 | 0.89 |
None | 120 | -0.01 | 0.79 |
Libertarian Party | 100 | 0.17 | 1.18 |
Constitution Party | 14 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
Republican Party | 508 | 0.46 | 0.76 |
Tea Party | 68 | 1.05 | 0.80 |
Party Preferences | N | Mean | SD | Range |
---|---|---|---|---|
Green Party | 40 | 3.47 | 1.30 | 1-9 |
Democratic Party | 560 | 4.42 | 0.95 | 1-9 |
Don’t know | 90 | 4.79 | 0.97 | 1-9 |
None | 120 | 4.92 | 0.87 | 1-9 |
Libertarian Party | 100 | 5.12 | 1.30 | 1-9 |
Constitution Party | 14 | 5.32 | 1.27 | 1-9 |
Republican Party | 508 | 5.44 | 0.83 | 1-9 |
Tea Party | 68 | 6.09 | 0.87 | 1-9 |
2016 [Trump vs. Clinton] | 2016 [Trump vs. Clinton] + Supporters | 2012 [Romney vs. Obama] | 2008 [McCain vs. Obama] | |||||||||
Odds Ratio | CI | Odds Ratio | CI | Odds Ratio | CI | Odds Ratio | CI | |||||
(Intercept) | 396.35 *** | 172.81 – 956.33 | 294.35 *** | 133.39 – 680.16 | 1169.18 *** | 483.40 – 2987.57 | 771.54 *** | 326.77 – 1919.01 | ||||
Economic System Justification | 0.30 *** | 0.25 – 0.36 | 0.32 *** | 0.27 – 0.37 | 0.25 *** | 0.21 – 0.30 | 0.28 *** | 0.23 – 0.33 | ||||
Observations | 1103 | 1148 | 1236 | 1206 | ||||||||
Notes | * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Party Identity
Figure X. Economic System Justification, Party Identity and Voting
Tables meant for checking the number of observations in each category of the above graph.
Donald Trump | Hilary Clinton | |
---|---|---|
Strong Democrat | 4 | 323 |
Democrat | 27 | 129 |
Leaning Democrat | 10 | 65 |
Independent | 17 | 16 |
Leaning Republican | 58 | 7 |
Republican | 166 | 24 |
Strong Republican | 282 | 7 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification, Party Identity and Voting
Tables meant for checking the number of observations in each category of the above graph.
Donald Trump | Hilary Clinton | |
---|---|---|
Strong Democrat | 6 | 649 |
Democrat | 58 | 307 |
Leaning Democrat | 18 | 196 |
Independent | 70 | 46 |
Leaning Republican | 181 | 15 |
Republican | 440 | 57 |
Strong Republican | 748 | 12 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Party Identity & Voting Preferences
2016 [Clinton vs. Trump] | 2016 [Trump vs. Clinton] + Supporters | |||||
Odds Ratio | CI | Odds Ratio | CI | |||
(Intercept) | 75.283 *** | 22.965 – 262.328 | 57.441 *** | 19.033 – 183.236 | ||
Party Identity | 0.007 *** | 0.004 – 0.012 | 0.009 *** | 0.006 – 0.014 | ||
Economic System Justification | 0.690 ** | 0.536 – 0.885 | 0.705 ** | 0.556 – 0.890 | ||
Observations | 1103 | 1148 | ||||
Notes | * p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 |
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Trump’s Likebility
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Clinton’s Likebility
Figure X. Economic System Justification & Johnson’s Likebility
1.1 Social Class
Figure X. Economic System Justification as grouped by SES