<!——–

Sam’s feedback:

my main feedback is that the page could do with a few sentences on what people can/should do with this. It might be worth noting if any are part of submitted manuscripts too. At the bottom, when you say if interested it might be worth explaining that a bit mroe too. e.g. collborating on writing up and submitting the results

Sam: you thought of putting together a data paper linking to the site? might be another way to drive traffic to it?

Flavio: Indeed, there is another data (AMAZING DATA) that has the same characteristics as mine : https://www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/en/about/new-zealand-attitudes-and-values-study.html and their creators have a methods/data paper: https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/nzavs/NZAVSTechnicalDocuments/NZAVS-Technical-Documents-e01-Sampling-Procedure-and-Sample-Details.pdf
But it is not published, in all likelihood because their data (nor mine) wont’ be published soon.

NZVAS has good language on this.

Sam:maybe something like a protocol paper for the data collection? just thinking of ways that you can basically advertise this outside of it being a stand alone website (which is awesome, but thinking about what academia seems to look at and value)

Sam: I think it’s fair to embargo data for a time. one additional option might be to gradually make the data open. e.g. early next year make the 2016 data open and write a data paper e.g. for journal of open pych data for that bunch. then you have extra advertising. then leave it a year or two and release the next batch publicly.

[18:10, 11/25/2020] Sam Parsons: that might be something that is made explicit or even having a stand out page on “collaborate with us to analyse the data” [18:11, 11/25/2020] Sam Parsons: in fact, if that’s a big part of the point, then I’ll double down on saying that this should be prominent in the website